Mid-Tribulationalism Examined
Mid-Tribulationalism Examined
1. Introduction
Midâtribulationalism is a minority but persistent view of the timing of the rapture in biblical eschatology. It holds that the church will live through the first half of Danielâs seventieth week (the sevenâyear tribulation) and will be caught up to Christ at or near the 3½âyear mark, just before the âgreat tribulation.â
This article defines midâtribulationalism, presents its main arguments (especially the âlast trumpetâ connection), and then evaluates those arguments biblically. In doing so, it will also show why the church is exempted from all of Danielâs seventieth week, not merely the second half.
2. What Is MidâTribulationalism?
The midâtribulational rapture view teaches:
- Danielâs seventieth week (Daniel 9:27) is a literal sevenâyear period yet future.
- Only the last half (3½ years) is âthe tribulationâ in the strict sense (âthe great tribulationâ; Matthew 24:21).
- The church will experience the first 3½ yearsâviewed as the âbeginning of sorrowsâ (Matthew 24:8)âbut will be raptured at the midpoint, just before Godâs eschatological wrath is poured out in full measure.
- Christâs coming for the church (rapture) and His return with the church in glory are distinct but separated by only 3½ years.
Key midâtribulational proponents have included J. Oliver Buswell, Gleason Archer, and Merrill Tenney.
3. Main Arguments for MidâTribulationalism
3.1 Emphasis on the 3½âYear Marker
Midâtribulationalists note that prophetic texts repeatedly highlight a 3½âyear period:
- âtime, times, and half a timeâ (Daniel 7:25; 12:7; Revelation 12:14)
- â1,260 daysâ (Revelation 11:3; 12:6)
- â42 monthsâ (Revelation 11:2; 13:5)
They argue that this repetition shows the midpoint of the week is the decisive turning point when:
- The Antichrist breaks his covenant with Israel (Daniel 9:27).
- The abomination of desolation is set up (Matthew 24:15).
- Intense persecution and judgment begin.
On this reading, some major âeventâ at the midpoint must mark a clear transition; midâtribulationists identify that event as the rapture of the church.
3.2 The âLast Trumpetâ Argument
Midâtribulationalists insist that the âlast trumpetâ of 1 Corinthians 15:52 and the trumpet in 1 Thessalonians 4:16 must be the same as the seventh trumpet in Revelation 11:15:
âFor the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed.â
â 1 Corinthians 15:52
âThen the seventh angel blew his trumpetâŚâ
â Revelation 11:15
Argument:
- The rapture occurs at the âlastâ trumpet (1 Corinthians 15:52).
- The seventh trumpet is the last in a sequence in Revelation.
- The seventh trumpet sounds at (or just after) the midpoint of the seventieth week.
- Therefore, the rapture must occur at or near the middle of the tribulation.
3.3 The Two Witnesses as a Type of the Church
Revelation 11 describes two prophetic witnesses in Jerusalem who minister for 1,260 days (3½ years), are killed, lie unburied, then are resurrected and caught up to heaven:
âThen they heard a loud voice from heaven saying to them, âCome up here!â And they went up to heaven in a cloud, and their enemies watched them.â
â Revelation 11:12
Some midâtribulationists argue:
- The two witnesses symbolize the church or representative church saints.
- Their being caught up to heaven in the middle of the seventieth week pictures the rapture of the church.
- This catching up coincides with the seventh trumpet and thus with the âlast trumpetâ of 1 Corinthians 15.
Others (e.g., Buswell) do not see the witnesses as representing the church but still place their rapture and the churchâs rapture together at midâweek.
3.4 The First Half Is Not âThe Wrath of Godâ
Midâtribulationists typically distinguish:
- First 3½ years: âbeginning of sorrowsâ (Matthew 24:8), largely characterized by manâs and Satanâs wrathâpersecution, war, famine.
- Last 3½ years: âgreat tribulationâ and âthe day of the LORD,â characterized by Godâs direct wrath (especially trumpet and bowl judgments).
Since the church is not appointed to wrath (1 Thessalonians 1:10; 5:9), they argue that:
- The church must be removed before Godâs wrath begins.
- But it need not be removed before the first half, since that is not yet âthe wrath of God.â
Thus the church is raptured midâtribulation, just before divine wrath falls in earnest.
4. Biblical Evaluation of MidâTribulational Arguments
4.1 Is the First Half of the Week Free from Godâs Wrath?
A critical claim of midâtribulationism is that Godâs eschatological wrath begins only after the midpoint. But Revelation itself, in harmony with the Old Testament, presents the early judgments as clearly divine.
4.1.1 The Lamb Opens the Seals
Revelation 5â6 shows that it is the Lamb who opens the seals:
âAnd I saw a mighty angel proclaiming with a loud voice, âWho is worthy to open the scroll and break its seals?ââŚ
And one of the elders said to me, âWeep no more; behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered, so that he can open the scroll and its seven seals.ââ
â Revelation 5:2, 5
Each seal judgment (Revelation 6:1â17; 8:1) proceeds from Christâs own authority. Even when God uses human and demonic agents, the source is the throne of God.
The first four seals (the âfour horsemenâ) bring conquest, war, famine, and deathâconditions the Old Testament repeatedly identifies as instruments of divine wrath (cf. Ezekiel 14:21; Leviticus 26:21â28; Deuteronomy 28:20â26).
4.1.2 The Wrath of the Lamb Declared at the Sixth Seal
At the sixth seal, unbelievers themselves recognize the source of these calamities:
ââŚcalling to the mountains and rocks, âFall on us and hide us from the face of him who is seated on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb, for the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?ââ
â Revelation 6:16â17
The verb âhas comeâ (Greek Älthen) is aorist indicative, pointing to wrath that has already arrived and is now present, not merely about to begin. By the sixth seal, oneâquarter of the worldâs population has already perished (Revelation 6:8), and the survivors interpret this as the outworking of Godâs wrath, not merely human anger or satanic malice.
So, biblically:
- Godâs wrath is already at work in the seal judgments, which unfold in the first part of the seventieth week.
- It is artificial to confine divine wrath to only the second half.
Since believers are explicitly promised deliverance âfrom the wrath to comeâ (1 Thessalonians 1:10), and âGod has not destined us for wrathâ (1 Thessalonians 5:9), consistency requires the church to be removed before the entire sequence of divine judgments begins, not only before its latter stages.
4.2 Does âLast Trumpetâ = the Seventh Trumpet?
Midâtribulationism stands or falls largely on equating the âlast trumpetâ of 1 Corinthians 15:52 with the seventh trumpet in Revelation 11:15. But this identification is exegetically weak for several reasons.
4.2.1 Different Contexts and Functions
-
In 1 Corinthians 15:52 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16, the trumpet is associated with:
- The resurrection of churchâage believers.
- The translation of the living.
- The joyful gathering of the church to Christ.
-
In Revelation 11:15, the seventh trumpet:
- Announces further judgments and the impending kingdom.
- Is explicitly one of a series of angelic trumpets of wrath (Revelation 8â11).
The trumpets have different purposes:
- The âlast trumpetâ of 1 Corinthians 15 is a trumpet of blessing, summoning saints to glory.
- The seventh trumpet of Revelation is a trumpet of judgment, heralding intensified woes on the unbelieving world.
Similarity of wording (âtrumpet,â âlastâ) does not prove identity; context determines meaning.
4.2.2 âLastâ in What Sense?
The adjective âlastâ (eschatos) in 1 Corinthians 15:52 need not mean âlast in an absolute chronological series of all trumpets ever sounded.â More naturally:
- It is the last trumpet of the church age, associated with the completion of Godâs program for the body of Christ.
- Jewish apocalyptic literature uses trumpets for a variety of eschatological eventsâjudgment, assembly, deliverance. Scripture itself uses more than one eschatological trumpet (e.g., Matthew 24:31; 1 Corinthians 15:52; Revelation 8â11).
Importantly, Matthew 24:31 mentions another trumpet, at the end of the tribulation, gathering elect survivors (primarily Israel) back to the land. It is at least as plausible to identify that endâofâtribulation trumpet as the âlastâ in a chronological sense as it is to identify the seventh trumpet.
Therefore, the âlast trumpetâ of 1 Corinthians 15 points not to the seventh trumpet of Revelation, but to the culminating, climactic signal of the churchâs resurrection and rapture, which is distinct from the trumpets of tribulational judgment.
4.3 Are the Two Witnesses the Church?
Midâtribulationists who see the two witnesses as symbols of the church face serious problems.
-
Literal profile: The two witnesses prophesy in Jerusalem, perform specific miracles (calling down fire, shutting the sky, turning water to blood), are killed, lie dead in the street for 3½ days, and are then resurrected and taken up. This detailed description strongly suggests two literal individuals, not a corporate symbol.
-
Universal martyrdom? If the two witnesses represent the church, then:
- The churchâs entire ministry in the first half must be limited to Jerusalem.
- The whole church must be killed and publicly displayed, for the world to gaze upon (Revelation 11:8â9).
- Resurrection and rapture of the entire church would have to occur 3½ days after that universal martyrdom.
Such implications are both absurd and contrary to other prophetic passages.
- Sequence with the seventh trumpet: Even if the two witnesses were symbolic, note that in Revelation 11 the witnesses are resurrected and taken up before the seventh trumpet sounds (Revelation 11:11â15). That order is opposite to 1 Corinthians 15:52, where:
- The trumpet sounds, and then
- The dead are raised and the living changed.
So, the identity of the witnesses and the timing of their ascension do not support a midâtrib rapture.
The better interpretation is that the two witnesses are literal prophets (often associated with Moses and Elijah) who minister in Jerusalem in the first half of the week, and whose resurrection and ascension are a sign within the tribulation, not the rapture of the church.
4.4 The Structure and Purpose of Danielâs Seventieth Week
Daniel 9:27 presents the seventieth week as a single, unified sevenâyear period decreed upon Israel and Jerusalem:
âSeventy weeks are decreed about your people and your holy cityâŚâ
â Daniel 9:24
The purposes listed (Daniel 9:24) are specifically Jewish:
- To finish the transgression.
- To put an end to sin.
- To atone for iniquity.
- To bring in everlasting righteousness.
- To seal both vision and prophet.
- To anoint a most holy place.
Throughout Scripture, the tribulation is:
- âThe time of Jacobâs troubleâ (Jeremiah 30:7).
- A period that culminates in Israelâs national repentance and restoration (Jeremiah 30:7â9; Zechariah 12:10; Romans 11:25â27).
In contrast, the church:
- Is a mystery, not revealed in the Old Testament (Ephesians 3:3â6; Colossians 1:26â27).
- Began uniquely at Pentecost (Acts 2).
- Is distinct from Israel (1 Corinthians 10:32; Romans 11).
If the entire seventieth week is decreed upon Israel and her city for accomplishing Godâs covenant purposes with them, it is unwarranted to insert the church into half of it. Consistent distinction between Israel and the church strongly favors the churchâs removal before the seventieth week begins, not in the middle.
4.5 The Promise to Be Kept âFrom the Hourâ
Revelation 3:10 is also decisive:
âBecause you have kept my word about patient endurance, I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming on the whole world, to try those who dwell on the earth.â
â Revelation 3:10
Key observations:
- The promise is to be kept not merely from trial within the hour, but from the hour itselfâthe entire time period of global testing.
- The trial is said to come upon âthe whole world,â indicating a worldwide tribulation, not a localized persecution.
- The phrase âthose who dwell on the earthâ is a technical term in Revelation for persistent unbelievers, never for the church.
The Greek phrase tÄreĹ ek (âkeep fromâ)âused also in John 17:15âbest fits the sense of exemption from entering the time, not protection while remaining within it. To argue that the church will be guarded âthroughâ most of the tribulation but removed at the midpoint does not do justice to the plain promise to be kept from the hour itself.
Coupled with 1 Thessalonians 1:10 and 5:9 (ânot destined for wrathâ), this implies that the church is exempt from the entire eschatological time of wrath, not just its second half.
4.6 The Loss of Imminence
Midâtribulationism, by definition, denies that Christâs coming for His church is imminent in the New Testament sense. If fixed, prophesied eventsâthe signing of the covenant (Daniel 9:27), the rise of the tenânation coalition, the initial seals of Revelation, the abomination of desolationâmust occur before the rapture, then:
- Believers cannot truly be watching for Christ âat any momentâ (cf. Philippians 3:20; Titus 2:13; James 5:7â9).
- They must instead watch for a known prophetic timetable to unfold.
The New Testament, however, exhorts believers:
ââŚto wait for his Son from heavenâŚâ
â 1 Thessalonians 1:10
ââŚwaiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus ChristâŚâ
â Titus 2:13
This attitude of constant expectancy is natural if the rapture is signless and possible at any moment, but it is strained if we know we must first endure at least 3½ years of apocalyptic events.
5. Why the Church Is Exempt from All of Danielâs Seventieth Week
From the preceding biblical data, a coherent picture emerges:
- Godâs wrath permeates the entire seventieth week, beginning with the opening of the first seal (Revelation 6).
- The church is promised deliverance from the wrath to come (1 Thessalonians 1:10; 5:9) and to be kept from the hour of worldwide trial (Revelation 3:10).
- Danielâs seventieth week is decreed upon Israel and Jerusalem, to complete Godâs covenant purposes with them (Daniel 9:24â27; Jeremiah 30:7).
- The church is a distinct entity, formed in this age, not addressed in Old Testament tribulation prophecies, and conspicuously absent from Revelation 4â18 as an earthly community.
- The rapture, presented as imminent, chronological prior to the Day of the Lord (1 Thessalonians 4:13â5:9), and as a comfort to saints, best fits as occurring before the onset of Danielâs seventieth weekânot in the middle or at the end.
Thus, the church is exempted not merely from half of Danielâs seventieth week, but from all seven years. To place the rapture at midâtribulation:
- Minimizes the early seals as somehow less truly divine.
- Forces an unwarranted identification of trumpets.
- Misreads symbolic details (two witnesses) as church typology.
- Undermines imminence.
- Confuses Israelâs prophetic program with the churchâs.
6. Conclusion
Midâtribulationalism seeks a mediating position between a preâtribulational rapture and the churchâs endurance of the full tribulation. Its key pillarsâthe âlast trumpetâ equation, the representative role of the two witnesses, and the claim that the first half of the week is not really Godâs wrathâdo not withstand careful exegetical scrutiny.
Scripture presents Danielâs seventieth week as a unified, divinely decreed period of judgment and restoration focused on Israel. From the opening of the seals, the judgments are explicitly the wrath of the Lamb. Yet the church is promised deliverance from that wrath and from the hour in which it falls, while being told to look continually for Christâs return.
On this biblical foundation, it is best to understand that the church will be removed before the seventieth week begins, not at its midpoint. The rapture is not a midâtribulational rescue from half of Godâs wrath, but a preâtribulational deliverance from the entire eschatological hour of trial that will come upon the whole world.
âFor God has not destined us for wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ.â
â 1 Thessalonians 5:9
Frequently Asked Questions
What is mid-tribulationalism?
What is the 'last trumpet' argument for mid-tribulationalism?
Does God's wrath begin only in the second half of the tribulation?
Why is mid-tribulationalism problematic?
Related Articles
Post-Tribulationalism Examined
Post-tribulationalism examined with a fair summary of the posttrib rapture view plus biblical critiques on imminence, the tribulation, and the millennium.
Pre-Tribulationalism Examined
Pretribulationalism examined: a detailed defense of the pre-trib rapture, IsraelâChurch distinction, exemption from wrath, and the doctrine of imminence.
The Pre-Wrath Rapture View Examined
Pre-wrath rapture view examined: timing in the second half of the tribulation, its Satan vs. God's wrath distinction, and why wrath begins at the seals.
The Partial Rapture View Examined
Partial rapture view examined: are only watchful believers raptured? Explore its arguments and a biblical case that all in Christ are caught up.